Why I love my Kindle

Me and my Kindle!

A little while ago, I mentioned that I’d bought a Kindle and that I’d post what I thought once I’d had a chance to read a few books on it. Well, that time has passed come.

Previously, I was reluctant to join the e-book world for a few reasons, such as:

  • I love the experience of reading a paper book, the smell, the feel, etc…
  • I don’t like what e-book sales are doing to bookstores.

My first concern has faded into non-existence, because it turns out that I much prefer the e-reading experience. Why? Because I love being able to:

  • put my Kindle down anywhere and pick it up again without losing my page
  • adjust the font size
  • highlight eloquent phrasing and make notes about technique
  • carry my current read around in my handbag, regardless of how long it is
  • search for a particular phrase when I want to check a potential plot inconsistency / repetitious phrase (yes, I do this in books I’m reading)
  • buy books for a much cheaper price (usually) than their paper equivalents
  • access a wider variety of books, including those that have only been digitally published
  • buy books from the comfort of home and have them instantly available (this is also slightly dangerous).

Initially, the non-touch screen irked me a little but now I don’t even think about it and giggled at my husband when he picked it up a few days ago and started prodding the screen.

Here are the only things that I don’t like about my Kindle:

  • Sometimes mainstream Australian books aren’t available for the Kindle (particularly if they were published more than a few years ago).
  • I’m still uncomfortable with the fact that I’m contributing to book shops in Australia closing down because I’m buying almost all of my books from Amazon. I still try to buy some books from my favourite independent bookstores, but it’s difficult when they’re double the e-book price.

How about you?

Do you have an e-reader? Do you love or hate the e-reading experience? If you don’t have one, are you considering making the switch?

8 Comments

Filed under Writing

Book review – two self publishing how-to guides

Now that I’ve made my decision to indie publish, I figured I’d better do some research. So I jumped onto Amazon and, after reading countless reviews, bought myself two how-two guides on indie/self publishing.

Let’s Get Digital: How to Self Publish, And Why You Should by David Gaughran

I really enjoyed this book. It got me quite excited about the indie publishing scene and fuelled some wow-this-could-really-take me-places fantasies. Throughout the book, Gaughran explains why he decided to self publish and dispels what he believes are common misconceptions about the traditional publishing and digital self publishing industries. He then guides the reader through the process of digital self publishing, encouraging writers to invest in quality editing and cover design.

The third section of the book is dedicated to success stories of self publishers. It steers clear of the well known stars like Amanda Hocking, John Locke and Joe Konrath, and instead lets thirty-three relatively unknown self publishers tell their individual stories in their own words. As you read story after story, the over-arching message of this book is driven home: “Self-publishing takes work, patience and a lot of luck to succeed, but the rewards are tremendous.” 

And another cool quote: “People love discovering new writers and new stories, and they love sharing their discoveries. As long as you tell people your book is there, as long as you promote it beyond your family and friends, you have a chance. Readers will hear about your book, either from a friend, or a review, or one of your promotions on a forum, or on Facebook, or on Goodreads, or on Twitter and they will check it out. 

If they like the cover, they will read the blurb. If they like that, they will read the sample. If they like the sample they may purchase the book. If they enjoy the read, they will tell more people. This is word-of-mouth, and it’s the only thing that has ever really sold books.”

What didn’t I like?

I was disappointed that the book only focused on digital publishing because, unlike Gaughran, I don’t believe that ‘print is doomed’. Perhaps it will be one day (I hope not), but we’re a long way from there at the moment. Also, I was hoping for some more nitty gritty detail on the self publishing process itself. Overall though, this book offered some fantastic insights and I’m definitely glad I read it!

Self-Printed: The Sane Person’s Guide to Self Publishing by Catherine Ryan Howard

If Gaughran’s book had me gazing up at the stars, Howard’s brought me back to earth with a crash. According to her, sane self publishers are a rare breed. ‘I ventured into their [self publishers'] forums, where the decorative scheme was five shades of Crazy, the distinct scent of eau de delusional hung in the air and everyone seemed to be complaining, confused, or both.’ 

You can imagine how many people’s hackles might rise when reading that! My hackles, however, remained stable. I loved this book. It gives you the self publishing facts with no holds barred, but softens any potential blows with witty, dry humour.

The nitty gritty that I would’ve liked from Gaughran, I found in Howard’s book. I also found some fantastic information on the in’s and out’s of print-on-demand publishing. Howard takes you through each step of: building an online platform (fairly happy with my ability in that area), publishing your paperback (using Createspace), publishing your e-book (using Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing and Smashwords), selling your book, launching your book and ‘everything else’.

Gaughran’s and Howard’s books probably sound poles apart – and in style and tone, they are. But they actually have a lot in common. They both stress the importance of editing, cover design, blurbs and reviews, and they both agree that with a lot of hard work, success in self publishing is possible.

What didn’t I like? 

Not much, to be honest. Occasionally, Howard’s blunt style was a little off-putting, and sometimes, I wish she’d stop with the witty banter and just get to the point, but I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend this book to any self-publishing hopeful. If readers take offence, it could be because they’ve breathed in too much of the scent of eau de delusional! 

Some of my favourite quotes

‘Do you have any idea how many people are self publishing books right now? There was probably a couple born in the time it took you to read that sentence and chances are neither of them are very good. Yes, there are a number of very successful self-publishers self-publishing very good books that lots of people like, but they are the exceptions to the rule.’

‘Before we go any further I want you to read these next three sentences aloud: I cannot expect each individual reader to compensate me for the years of blood, sweat and tears that went into writing this book. The price tag on my book is not a reflection of how much work went into it. I have to look at the big picture and acknowledge that if I insist on being a greedy b—–d and overcharging people, then I won’t sell any copies at all.’

‘Covers are important to books, but they are the most important thing about self published books…. even if you’re the next Jonathan Franzen and your book is better than The Corrections and Freedom combined, no one is going to buy it if your cover looks like a pile of (water-coloured?) poo.’

How about you?

Have you read any good books on self publishing? Do either of these books appeal to you? Or is self publishing totally not your thing?

9 Comments

Filed under Book review, Self publishing

Why I’ve decided to go indie

If you’ve been following my blog for a while, you’ll know that I’ve been leaning towards indie publishing my novel, The Big Smoke, for more than a year now. Well, I’ve finally decided for sure – I’m going to do it. I’m flying solo.

If you’re new here, you’ll probably assume that I’ve already tried my hand at getting a traditional publishing contract and clocked up countless rejections. But that would be incorrect. I’ve decided to skip that part.

‘Are you crazy?’ I can hear you saying. ‘Don’t you at least want to give traditional publishing a shot before you make the decision to indie publish?’

Short answer: no.

Why? Because, as we all know, it’s incredibly difficult to get an agent and publisher, even when your manuscript fits the narrow window of what traditional publishers are looking for. And The Big Smoke doesn’t fit that window. Based on my research, traditional publishers are unwilling to take a risk on young adult fiction by new authors that’s over 90,000 words. The Big Smoke is about 140,000 words.

That doesn’t make it unsellable. It just means that the risk for a traditional publisher to take it on is higher, because they would earn less profit for each book sold. Why? Because big books cost more to print, but you can’t necessarily charge much more for a big book than a thinner book. There’s only so much readers are willing to pay for a book, after all.

I get that. And I don’t blame traditional publishers for avoiding projects that have more risks, especially not in today’s market. But that doesn’t mean The Big Smoke isn’t worth reading, or that it won’t find an audience out there. I believe it’s good enough to publish, and so do my beta readers. So that’s what I’m going to do.

There are a few more reasons why going indie appeals to me:

  • The Big Smoke will be available to readers a lot faster than if I waited for a publishing offer (which in all likelihood would never come).
  • I’m a bit of a control freak, so the idea of having ultimate control over the whole project really appeals to me
  • I probably won’t sell nearly as many copies, but I’ll get much higher royalties for each book sold.

Where to from here?

Once I get feedback from my second group of beta readers (in early July, hopefully), I’ll make any required changes then send the manuscript off to be professionally edited and proof read (if you know any high-quality Australian freelance fiction editors, let me know!).

While that’s happening, I’ll also be commissioning a professional cover designer to produce an awesome cover that will work for both hard copy and e-books. Once all of that is done, I’ll release the book through Amazon, Smashwords and Createspace Print on Demand.

And then the blog tour and celebrations will begin! :D

As you can probably tell, I’m feeling pretty excited about all of this. I’m not expecting to be the next Amanda Hocking by any stretch of the imagination, but just the thought of my book being available for readers makes me feel all warm inside. And if I can make back the money I spend on publishing and a bit more, that’d be awesome too.

Stay tuned, because I’ll be keeping you up to date every step of the way!

Your turn

What do you think about my decision? Feel free to be honest! What are you plans for your work-in-progress? Are you hoping to get a traditional publishing contract or does going indie appeal to you too?

36 Comments

Filed under Progress update, Self publishing, Writing

The 24-hour Book

I’ve recently learned of a super-exciting project coming up in Brisbane, my home city, on 11 June. Aptly named the 24-Hour Book, the project involves a team of authors and editors collaborating, writing, and publishing a book in one 24-hour period.

At midday on 11 June, nine Australian authors will gather at the State Library of Queensland and begin writing furiously. Their stories will be written live, and they’ll post their work-in-progress online so readers can see the story develop and offer ideas and suggestions and contributions. When the stories are finished, a crew of editors will take the text from manuscript to a book.

How cool does that sound? I’ll definitely be watching on and making suggestions. Maybe I’ll influence its progress… The day after the project (12 June),  the finished book will be available in both digital and print.

Why are collaborators doing this project? Because they can, and because it’ll be fun. They also hope to “explore how a digital process informs and influences collaborative writing and editing in a combination of face-to-face and screen-to-screen.”

“There are really three collaborations taking place: author to author, author to editor, and book to audience. As we write, updates will be made accessible on the web, the audience will be able to see the work unfolding on screen and interact with it via comments. Comments and suggestions will be filtered back to the authors, potentially influencing the direction of the story.”

I’m terribly excited about being a part of this, especially considering some of my favourite authors are involved. The line-up includes Nick Earls, Steven Amsterdam, Kristy Kneen, P.M Newton, Christopher Currie, Rjurik Davidson, Angela Slatter, Geoff Lemon and Simon Groth.

Bring on 11 June! If you’re interested, you can find out more about the project at the Future of the Book website.

Your turn

What do you think of this project? Will you be watching it unfold? Do you think we’ll be seeing more projects like this in the future? Is that a good or a bad thing, in your opinion?

6 Comments

Filed under Writing

Bring on beta reader round two!

You may have noticed that it’s been ages a little while since I’ve blogged about my progress on my WiP, The Big Smoke. That’s because, well… there hasn’t been much progress – until recently. Don’t get me wrong, I was doing a lot of thinking about my book and the feedback from my first group of beta readers, I just wasn’t making many hard and fast decisions about what changes to make. I guess I just needed some time for the ideas to percolate.

And percolate they did. Last week, I finally got my butt back in the chair and my fingers on the keyboard and made the hard decisions. And you know what? I’m really happy with how it’s come together. My beta readers helped me to see my work through different eyes and gave me some awesome ideas about where I could push things just that little bit further to really ramp up the tension.

So now that the changes are done, the manuscript is off to beta reader group two! My original plan was to get it to this group in December last year – hah! What high hopes I had. ;) The last group received The Big Smoke in three chunks, whereas the new group will get it in one hit, so I’m looking forward to their feedback in terms of overall consistency and repetition that may not have been apparent to the first group (plus their opinions on anything else, of course).

I’ve asked the second group to give me their feedback within six to eight weeks, and while I’m waiting, I’ll be doing a lot more research into the Australian self publishing market (more on this soon) and starting to plot my next book. YAH!! How exciting is that?! I’ve been working on The Big Smoke (previously Tangled, previously Entwined…) for SO long, I can’t wait to create some new characters. My next book will still be young adult, but it’s going to have some historical and science fiction-y elements too. Can’t wait!

Your turn

How’s your writing going? Hit any major milestones recently? Or, avoiding making any hard decisions? :-)

13 Comments

Filed under Beta readers, Editing, Writing

Digging the short stories…

I’ve never been much of a short story reader previously. I’ve always preferred something meatier, longer, more satisfying.

Wow, I just re-read that line and cringed. But rather than re-writing it, I’m going to leave it as is and you let you have an immature little giggle like I did. :D

But back to the point. I’ve always enjoyed novels far more than short stories in the past, and while my heart will always truly belong to the longer form of fiction, I’ve enjoyed quite a number of  short stories recently. In the busyness of day-to-day life, there’s something quite satisfying about being able to start and finish a story  on the daily commute. I really admire authors who are able to create believable characters and a compelling plot within the confines of a short story – those authors have word economy down to a fine art!

The two short stories I’ve enjoyed most recently are The Secret Life of Veal by Nick Earls and Labyrinth by Rachel Morgan. Below are mini reviews of the stories, to match their mini length.

Labyrinth

Click to visit Amazon page for this story

Labyrinth is the second novelette in Rachel’s Creepy Hollow series, and it picks up right where Guardian left off. I won’t include too much about Labyrinth‘s plot in case you haven’t read Guardian yet, but you should really remedy that ASAP.

In Labyrinth, Vi’s confident, sarcastic yet warm voice bursts onto the page and we get to know Nate-the-human a lot better as things in Creepy Hollow get a whole lot, err, creepier. The title definitely suits the content of the story as I often didn’t have a clue which direction the plot would go. When the finale left me on a cliffhanger, I could have screamed, but only because I so desperately wished Book 3, Traitor, was already available. I’m now eagerly anticipating the news that Traitor has been released and can’t wait to see which way the series twists next.

The Secret Life of Veal 

Click to visit Amazon page for this story

As an animal rights advocate, I approached this story with a degree of trepidation. And as I feared, it pays out on vegans. But honestly, no matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t not enjoy this tale.  Nick Earls has long been a favourite author of mine because of his dry, depreciating sense of humour, and in The Secret Life of Veal, he delivers yet again.

Neither of the main characters are particularly likeable, but they’re both perfect fodder for snorts of laughter and rolling eyes.  Nick has created two people who are so different but yet both so vile, they’re somehow perfect for each other. If you enjoy dry wit and characters you love to hate, this will be right up your alley.

Your turn

How about you? Have you read either of these short stories? Do you like short stories or do you only have eyes for novels? Any other short stories you’d recommend?

13 Comments

Filed under Book review, Writing

Book review – The Reformed Vampires Support Group by Catherine Jinks

Blurb

Click to see Good Reads page

Nina Harrison became a vampire in 1973, when she was fifteen, and she hasn’t aged a day since then. But she hasn’t had any fun, either; she still lives with her mum, and the highlight of her sickly, couchbound life is probably her Tuesday-night group meeting, which she spends with a miserable bunch of fellow sufferers, being lectured at.

But then one of the group is mysteriously turned to ashes . . . and suddenly they’re all under threat. That’s when Nina decides to prove that every vampire on earth isn’t a weak, pathetic loser. Along with her friend Dave, she hunts down the culprit ─ and soon finds herself up against some gun-toting werewolf traffickers who’ll stop at nothing.

Can a bunch of feeble couch potatoes win a fight like this? Is there more to your average vampire than meets the eye?

My thoughts

This book is heaps of fun. It’s definitely not your normal vampire tale (as you can tell by the blurb) and that’s what attracted me to it. I enjoy vampire stories (yes, I’m a twi-hard) and I was keen to see how Jinks put a new spin on this age-old myth. I also chose it as part of the Australian Women Writers Challenge, in which I committed to read six books by Australian women authors and review at least three of them this year. This is the third book I’ve read but the first I’ve reviewed.

Anyway, back to The Reformed Vampires Support Group! Nina and her friends are a sorry bunch. I’m glad that I (as a reader) didn’t have to sit through a normal support group meeting, because they sound deadly dull (pardon the pun). Instead, I was taken on a crazy, pot-holed journey as the group of vampires and Father Ramon, their long-suffering priest friend, tried to work out how to deal with the vampire slayer in their midst. As you can imagine, when you’re weak, lethargic and likely to hallucinate if you go without your daily Guinea Pig, a vampire slayer is really bad news. But the way Nina and her friends try to handle the situation just makes things worse and soon they’ve got some homicidal werewolf traffickers wanting to kill them too. Oops!

TRVSP is told in first person, and for the most part, I really enjoyed Nina’s voice. She’s dry, sarcastic and somehow simultaneously down-trodden and light-hearted. Her scathing opinions of the other vampires in her group (and vampires in general) often brought a smile to my face, and I found her character arc both interesting and believable.

However, I felt that the narrative could have been a lot tighter (with many redundant sentences removed), and a narrative device used twice in the book (described by the narrator herself as ‘cheating’) broke me out of Jinks’ world and smacked of ‘the easy way out’. The multitude of dialogue tags drove me slightly nuts – murmured, ‘wanted to know’, nagged, advised, inquired, exclaimed, whined, mused, growled, demanded, added, chided, remonstrated, announced, protested, pointed out, squawked – and that’s just in the first chapter. I find colourful dialogue tags quite distracting, and I’ve read a few writing books that strongly advise against them. (To be honest, I’m not sure whether creative tags used to annoy me before all of the writing books brought them to my attention, but that’s another issue!) They probably would’ve annoyed me a lot more if this had’ve been a serious book, but I’ve got to admit they did suit the tongue-in-cheek tone.

The story lagged in some parts as the vampires spent pages upon pages deciding what to do next, but on the whole I was kept entertained and enjoyed getting to know the saddest bunch of vampires that ever lived existed. I’m looking forward to catching up with the characters again in the Abused Werewolf Support Group.

I recommend TRVSG to anyone who enjoys comical paranormal teen fiction. Avid fans of spine-chilling stories with sexy, violent vampires might want to choose a different book!

My rating

3.5-stars

3.5 stars

What’s your opinion?

Have you read The Reformed Vampires Support Group? If so, what did you think? If not, do you plan to?

My 1-5 scale
1: Terrible. I couldn’t finish it.
2: Dissatisfying.
3: Good but not great.
3.5: A solid, enjoyable read but still some elements not working for me.
4: Really enjoyable with very few flaws OR flawed, but I loved it anyway.
4.5: Unputdownable. Close to perfect. I’ll rave about it to anyone who listens.
5: Perfection (i.e. pretty much unattainable).

3 Comments

Filed under Book review, Reading, YA fiction